Singer sues BBC for £10 million, claims ‘Glow Up’ fact display stole her concept | The Specific Tribune
Gladness Jukic, a 32-year-old singer who plays underneath the identify Bossiie, is suing the BBC for £10 million, alleging that the broadcaster ripped off her concept for the hit fact display ‘Glow Up: Britain’s Subsequent Make-Up Big name’.
The display, which sees aspiring makeup artists compete for a prestigious contract with probably the most largest names within the business, premiered on BBC3 in 2019 and has since develop into a well-liked fixture on tv.
Jukic claims that she emailed a nine-page PowerPoint pitch titled ‘Bossiie: 10-Minute Makeover’ to BBC commissioning editors in Might 2018, simply ahead of the display used to be commissioned. In keeping with Jukic, the concept that of her pitch — which featured self-taught YouTube makeup artists competing, with business tie-ins to attractiveness manufacturers — is just about just like ‘Glow Up’, which used to be created via Wall to Wall Media Ltd, a subsidiary of Warner Bros.
Alternatively, the BBC denies the allegations, insisting that they by no means gained Jukic’s pitch. They argue that her e-mail bounced again for the reason that attachment used to be too huge for the machine. A consultant from the BBC’s criminal staff, Ashton Chantrielle, informed the Top Court docket that the display’s idea used to be already evolved and pitched via Wall to Wall to the BBC previous to the alleged submission of Jukic’s remedy.
Chantrielle mentioned, “The ‘Glow Up’ display is an unique structure, created independently via W2W [Wall to Wall Media], and produced regardless of Ms. Jukic’s remedy. The speculation for ‘Glow Up’ used to be first conceived via W2W ahead of the advent of Ms. Jukic’s remedy.”
Jukic, who could also be in quest of to ascertain possession of the display’s copyright, claims that ‘Glow Up’ used to be “stolen” from her and that she will have to be compensated for her concept. She has already misplaced a prior criminal fight over a failed trademark for the identify ‘Glow Up: Britain’s Subsequent Make-Up Big name’, which used to be contested via Warner Bros, resulting in a £2,500 courtroom price.
In her Top Court docket declare, Jukic argues that the display’s similarities to her personal remedy — together with the aggressive structure and the involvement of makeup manufacturers — warrant monetary reimbursement for the alleged infringement. Alternatively, the BBC’s criminal staff insists that the average parts shared between the 2 displays are too “elementary” to be safe via copyright legislation, such because the inclusion of a pro pass judgement on or the contest structure.
A vital level of rivalry is the display’s center of attention. Jukic’s pitch highlighted the involvement of self-taught YouTubers, while ‘Glow Up’ options extra conventional makeup artists and does now not emphasize emblem collaborations to the similar stage. Chantrielle additionally famous that there’s no proof that Jukic’s e-mail used to be ever effectively delivered.
In spite of the continuing criminal fight, the BBC stays assured in its protection. The broadcaster’s barristers argue that although the courtroom does now not strike Jukic’s case out totally, their protection is powerful sufficient to resist additional scrutiny.
Jukic’s declare comes at a time when the ‘Glow Up’ franchise is on the height of its recognition, with more than one seasons aired and the display garnering a faithful fan base. Whether or not the singer will be capable to persuade the pass judgement on that her case warrants a complete trial continues to be noticed. After a long listening to, the pass judgement on reserved his resolution and can announce it at a later date.
Within the period in-between, Jukic continues to push for popularity and reimbursement, claiming she has suffered each monetary and emotional misery because of the alleged copyright infringement.
